Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SaltielA's avatar

It takes a long time to review one's own beliefs and identify any misunderstandings.

Here, I am referring to "rules" that would require me to be neutral in public due to professional commitments.

I am a psychoanalytic psychotherapist, sometimes, just simply, a psychoanalyst.

I have to set that against what I have been studying in other contexts: the various impetuses and incentives that operate on a societal level.

How could society go so profoundly wrong in such a fundamental area?

What are the implications for this society?

I can't introduce any of the issues in sufficient detail in a comment like this.

1. Sandie Peggie has "lodged a complaint ... [T]his has resulted in an employment tribunal. All of this costs ..."

2. While there is ".. a qualified doctor, saying: “I am biologically female” and that “biological sex is a nebulous term and doesn’t really mean anything …nobody can actually define biological sex” .."

1. The employer knows how to draw a line, to "pull the switch", notwithstanding the cost this entails. One would expect the cost to be a sufficient disincentive not to draw the line in the wrong place.

2. What is it about this argument that disregards the need to draw lines? How very poorly society has been served by people who should know such things. People are intimidated into a state of confusion, of ambiguity about the nature of this line, precisely because it is based on fragile individual emotions. That doesn't mean the line should not be drawn -- here that women need to feel safe -- but, on the contrary, the line should be referred to with reassuring certainty.

Expand full comment
Rita Symon's avatar

You lay the facts out so clearly

Expand full comment

No posts